15 de Setembro de 2025

 
 

EARA News Digest 2025 - Week 38


Welcome to your Monday morning update, from EARA, on the latest news in biomedical science, policy and openness on animal research. 

This week: Research highlights the need to make animal studies more reliableCanadian university defends dog research amidst political controversyMice study links maternal stress to childhood eczema.

Research highlights the need to make animal studies more reliable    

A review of animal experiments has identified clear opportunities to improve how studies are designed and analysed, which could increase the reliability and impact of research using animals. 

Researchers from the University of Saskatchewan and the University of Calgary, Canada, analysed 120 studies published in 2022, conducted in North America and Europe and involving mice, rats and hamsters. They found that fewer than 2.5% of studies included key practices to reduce bias.  

Some of these practices are: 

  • Randomisation – assigning animals to experimental groups by chance. 

  • Blinding – ensuring researchers do not know, when recording results, which animals received which treatment, to prevent unconscious bias. 

  • Controlling for cage effects – recognising that differences in housing, such as light, noise or enrichment, can affect behaviour and outcomes and control these effects with adequate experimental design and minimising variable factors. 

The authors recommend that academic institutions educate specialists in study design and analysis, who could work alongside biomedical researchers to make animal studies more reproducible and improve the contribution of animal research to medical progress. 

The paper, published in Scientific Reports, concluded: “Only through these concerted efforts can the biomedical research community improve reproducibility, uphold ethical standards in laboratory animal experiments and build the confidence in preclinical research that is crucial for the health of both animals and humans.” 

 

 

Canadian university defends dog research amidst political controversy 

Queen’s University, an EARA member, has strongly defended its decades-long use of dogs in biomedical research, following Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s announcement that the province will introduce legislation to ban the use of dogs and cats in science.  

Andrew Winterborn, Queen’s Director of Animal Care Services, told The Kingston Whig-Standard, that the university’s haemophilia dog colony has directly contributed to the development and regulatory approval of gene therapies now used in human patients. The dogs carry a naturally occurring form of the genetic disorder and are involved in non-invasive, long-term studies that aim to identify a cure. 

Winterborn expressed concern that excluding dogs from research would, “do a disservice to biomedical research,” given their essential role in translational medicine. In 2024, Queen’s used 43 dogs — just 0.14% of the total number of animals used in research by the university.  

All non-affected dogs are adopted out and rehomed, and animal welfare standards are governed both by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) and Ontario’s Animals for Research Act — the only province in Canada with specific legislation for animals in science. The university is CCAC-certified, enabling access to federal funding and ensuring ethical oversight. 

Ontario’s proposed legislation follows public outcry over unrelated research with dogs at a hospital in London, Ontario, but experts have warned that a ban could obstruct necessary biomedical progress.  

“There will need to be a continued use of animals, in a judicious way, to understand disease processes as well as to find treatment mechanisms. But everything we do, while they’re being used, is to maximize their health and welfare,” concluded Winterborn.  

Read EARA’s original statement on the matter here.  

 

 

Mice study links maternal stress to childhood eczema  

Researchers in France have discovered that stress during pregnancy can make the progeny susceptible to develop eczema, in a study using mice.  

Eczema is the most common chronic pediatric skin condition and causes itchy, scaly and flaky skin. Epidemiological studies have linked childhood eczema to maternal stress, but a biological explanation was unknown. 

Researchers at the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) discovered that newborn mice born from mothers that experienced mild stress during pregnancy — by having their movement restrained and placed under light for short periods of time — were more likely to developed eczema than mice born from animals that were free to roam. 

By analysing the skin of the progeny, researchers found that a type of inflammatory cells called mast cells were altered in mice born from mothers that experienced stress during pregnancy, leading to itching and swelling. Using mice without mast cells, they found that even if their mothers were stressed during pregnancy the newborns did not develop eczema.  

If the same mechanism occurs in humans, these findings, published in Nature, could lead to new therapeutic approaches for childhood eczema. The discoveries additionally highlight the importance of stress management during pregnancy.  

Registo na página SPCAL

O registo é rápido e permite-lhe acesso a conteúdos exclusivos e reservados para utilizadores cadastrados na página da Sociedade Portuguesa de Ciências em Animais de Laboratório.

Efetuar registo